I have lived the better part of almost two years in higher education classrooms (weekends primarily) where browsing an author, concept, or technical term took me deeper, for a few minutes, that the “presenter” will ever know. On multiple occasions, I went to amazon.com to purchase a title referenced only to find the extended reading as valuable as the discussion at hand.
Here’s the point, instructors open to the process of inquiry and a constructivist approach welcome the momentum they create in their topic of study. Touchdown!

Are all instructors comfortable with the process of my open notebook (computers) rather than the typical open notebook (spiral variety)? No. Why:
INSTRUCTOR A: I know the sum total of what you need to know – so sit back and enjoy.
MY RESPONSE: I respect what you know and can be able to do, but I am not a passive learner.

INSTRUCTOR B: I will control your learning because what I want you to learn is static and the experiences I structure for you conform to the parameters of learning I have set. Tools I use help me to increase my ability to share content.
MY RESPONSE: I am more inquisitive and creative than you give me credit for. Let’s collaborate on what I can do show you what I learned, what I can do with my new learning. My tools help me to make more meaning from the content you present.
INSTRUCTOR C: I want to make sure I can cover material and manage conversations that fit our time frame.
MY RESPONSE: I respect the quality of content and pacing of instruction, which is critical to classroom management. I just need to process what you are teaching in non-linear ways.

So, what this type of learning look like in a high school? middle school? elementary school? How can we use technologies, or structure for student use of technology, to enlarge their capacity for learning, and demonstrating what they know and can be able to do?

YOUR RESPONSE?

My experience with Laptops in a small graduate level class five summers back was wonderful. We had constant fact checking, with new, interesting, relevant information being added into the learning environment. It allowed a much wider sphere of ‘expertise’ to manifest and, yet, respect for the professor never diminished.
The other shoe however does make a rather loud sound as it drops. ‘Paying attention for 50 minutes without wandering off mentally’ is a most basic practice in all of the great meditative traditions and seems to be a much neglected aspect of our mental training or ‘schooling’ in America today. We must not fall into the ever present ‘multi tasking’ excuse as a substitute for deep engagement in learning. Without the most basic skill of knowing how ‘to pay attention’ we may just be traveling to Disneyland school in which all is entertainment (or boredom).

Just my half pence.

Interesting. While I am a strong advocate of laptops in the classroom and using technology to enhance learning, quoting Godin and placing all the blame on faculty is perhaps a touch misguided? Not only should faculty learn to embrace technology, but students must also learn a bit of responsibility and that there are times when you need to focus.

I see an opportunity here to teach several lessons that will serve students well in the long run.