<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What exactly IS leadership?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html</link>
	<description>Technology, leadership, and the future of schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Becker</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html/comment-page-1#comment-13558</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html#comment-13558</guid>
		<description>Greg, nice job as guest blogger!  Scott has big shoes (literally and figuratively) to step into, even if only for a short while.

Having read this post about leadership, I have two comments.  First, if it&#039;s true that &quot;we&quot; don&#039;t know what leadership is, it&#039;s not from a lack of trying.  Some VERY smart and very well-meaning educators (largely professors) have spent decades studying what leadership is.  So, perhaps the problem is that there are too many competing conceptions of leadership?

Second, you wrote &quot;I think one of the problems is that leadership, whatever that is, is usually only one component of most administrative jobs.&quot;  Here I have to respectfully disagree.  I think leadership IS the job; the ONLY job.  It&#039;s not a component of anything.  From time to time, and hopefully as infrequently as possible, leaders have to do a bit of managing.  But, at all times, leadership is the overarching job title.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, nice job as guest blogger!  Scott has big shoes (literally and figuratively) to step into, even if only for a short while.</p>
<p>Having read this post about leadership, I have two comments.  First, if it&#8217;s true that &#8220;we&#8221; don&#8217;t know what leadership is, it&#8217;s not from a lack of trying.  Some VERY smart and very well-meaning educators (largely professors) have spent decades studying what leadership is.  So, perhaps the problem is that there are too many competing conceptions of leadership?</p>
<p>Second, you wrote &#8220;I think one of the problems is that leadership, whatever that is, is usually only one component of most administrative jobs.&#8221;  Here I have to respectfully disagree.  I think leadership IS the job; the ONLY job.  It&#8217;s not a component of anything.  From time to time, and hopefully as infrequently as possible, leaders have to do a bit of managing.  But, at all times, leadership is the overarching job title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html/comment-page-1#comment-13559</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html#comment-13559</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon,

Thanks for the affirmation.

You articulate it much better than I do. When I was at Marshall they were trying hard to define the body of knowledge leaders needed to study. That was a constant theme.

I think that leadership does permeate all aspects of a job in educational administration. It should at least. And those who fail often fail first and foremost to lead.

I also think that leadership is a portable concept that can be carried from job to job, certainly from task to task.

I guess I was trying to say that a) we don&#039;t have complete consensus yet on the broad concept of leadership and b) it&#039;s hard to find the edges of the concept, to draw contrast and say &quot;that&#039;s leadership but this is not&quot; because it often depends on circumstance to some extent...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>Thanks for the affirmation.</p>
<p>You articulate it much better than I do. When I was at Marshall they were trying hard to define the body of knowledge leaders needed to study. That was a constant theme.</p>
<p>I think that leadership does permeate all aspects of a job in educational administration. It should at least. And those who fail often fail first and foremost to lead.</p>
<p>I also think that leadership is a portable concept that can be carried from job to job, certainly from task to task.</p>
<p>I guess I was trying to say that a) we don&#8217;t have complete consensus yet on the broad concept of leadership and b) it&#8217;s hard to find the edges of the concept, to draw contrast and say &#8220;that&#8217;s leadership but this is not&#8221; because it often depends on circumstance to some extent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html/comment-page-1#comment-13560</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html#comment-13560</guid>
		<description>Greg, Thanks for the post. In 1997 I was in a graduate seminar on organizational development. We had MBAs, Public Admin PhDs, EdD&#039;s, an interesting mix of students. Each week students gave presentations on leadership books in our suggested reading list. Overall we must have covered at least 50 books, each with a different definition of leadership.

The bottom line: a leader is somebody that people follow. An individual will follow different kinds of leaders for different purposes, preferring one for president, and another for soccer coach. By the same token a &#039;leader&#039; will attract different kinds of followers depending on where he/she&#039;s going and how they&#039;ll get there. The situation, or the followership, may indicate different leadership styles or personality.

Case in point: Most will probably agree that both Obama and Clinton are leaders. The more important question is, who wants to follow?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, Thanks for the post. In 1997 I was in a graduate seminar on organizational development. We had MBAs, Public Admin PhDs, EdD&#8217;s, an interesting mix of students. Each week students gave presentations on leadership books in our suggested reading list. Overall we must have covered at least 50 books, each with a different definition of leadership.</p>
<p>The bottom line: a leader is somebody that people follow. An individual will follow different kinds of leaders for different purposes, preferring one for president, and another for soccer coach. By the same token a &#8216;leader&#8217; will attract different kinds of followers depending on where he/she&#8217;s going and how they&#8217;ll get there. The situation, or the followership, may indicate different leadership styles or personality.</p>
<p>Case in point: Most will probably agree that both Obama and Clinton are leaders. The more important question is, who wants to follow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html/comment-page-1#comment-13561</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2008/02/what-exactly-is.html#comment-13561</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

Well put. I think my favorite definition of all times is that a leader is someone who goes first. Administration often doesn&#039;t allow for that type of leadership, replacing it with the idea that a leader is someone who delegates responsibility in an inspiring manner...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>Well put. I think my favorite definition of all times is that a leader is someone who goes first. Administration often doesn&#8217;t allow for that type of leadership, replacing it with the idea that a leader is someone who delegates responsibility in an inspiring manner&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

