<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Wesch dust-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html</link>
	<description>Technology, leadership, and the future of schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Stager</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html/comment-page-1#comment-13905</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Stager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html#comment-13905</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

The difference pre and post-blogosphere is that nobody would have seen the video a few years ago and therefore noted educators would not be labeling it &quot;amazing&quot; or applying special significance to it.

I&#039;m finding it difficult to write in such a way that readers understand that I don&#039;t care about this or that particular student project as much as I am alarmed by the irrational exuberance afforded such artifacts.

Since the blogosphere is typically in the first-person, I struggle with &quot;attacking the ball without attacking the player.&quot;

All the best,

Gary
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>The difference pre and post-blogosphere is that nobody would have seen the video a few years ago and therefore noted educators would not be labeling it &#8220;amazing&#8221; or applying special significance to it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m finding it difficult to write in such a way that readers understand that I don&#8217;t care about this or that particular student project as much as I am alarmed by the irrational exuberance afforded such artifacts.</p>
<p>Since the blogosphere is typically in the first-person, I struggle with &#8220;attacking the ball without attacking the player.&#8221;</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Aldrich</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html/comment-page-1#comment-13906</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Aldrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html#comment-13906</guid>
		<description>I read the links, and found Gary&#039;s opinion very knee-jerk.  After thinking about it some more, I wrote a post trying to frame the whole issue in a different way.   http://globalvirtual.blogspot.com/2007/11/elbonian-takeover.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the links, and found Gary&#8217;s opinion very knee-jerk.  After thinking about it some more, I wrote a post trying to frame the whole issue in a different way.   <a href="http://globalvirtual.blogspot.com/2007/11/elbonian-takeover.html" rel="nofollow">http://globalvirtual.blogspot.com/2007/11/elbonian-takeover.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott McLeod</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html/comment-page-1#comment-13907</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html#comment-13907</guid>
		<description>Gary, that&#039;s a great point. One of the things I note about my law school experience was that they did a great job of teaching us how to have fierce, intellectual conversations and disagreements without taking it personally. In other words, we could have a ferocious, no-holds barred (and phenomenal) conversation about some legal issue and then go out for a beer afterward, enlighted by the others&#039; viewpoint. Sometimes the edublogosphere could benefit from a little more of that...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, that&#8217;s a great point. One of the things I note about my law school experience was that they did a great job of teaching us how to have fierce, intellectual conversations and disagreements without taking it personally. In other words, we could have a ferocious, no-holds barred (and phenomenal) conversation about some legal issue and then go out for a beer afterward, enlighted by the others&#8217; viewpoint. Sometimes the edublogosphere could benefit from a little more of that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Mercer</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html/comment-page-1#comment-13908</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html#comment-13908</guid>
		<description>It may be a &quot;student&quot; artifact, but there are few of those that have such wide circulation. Also, whether intended or not, this is a propaganda piece about education, and how it is out of sync with modern life. It&#039;s reached more people, and more importantly, more non-educators rather than the usual stakeholders that you, or Mr. Stager, reach. It may not read like a graduate thesis, or a Truffaut oeuvre, or even a &quot;slick&quot; political ad, but that will give it a real and genuine quality making it more believable to the general audience and therefore more effective. Mr. Stager may give it an &quot;D&quot; as a college level project, I give it an &quot;A&quot; as a college level speech and propaganda project. Political propaganda does not need to name a solution, it only needs to name a problem.
Thanks for the spot to share my views...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be a &#8220;student&#8221; artifact, but there are few of those that have such wide circulation. Also, whether intended or not, this is a propaganda piece about education, and how it is out of sync with modern life. It&#8217;s reached more people, and more importantly, more non-educators rather than the usual stakeholders that you, or Mr. Stager, reach. It may not read like a graduate thesis, or a Truffaut oeuvre, or even a &#8220;slick&#8221; political ad, but that will give it a real and genuine quality making it more believable to the general audience and therefore more effective. Mr. Stager may give it an &#8220;D&#8221; as a college level project, I give it an &#8220;A&#8221; as a college level speech and propaganda project. Political propaganda does not need to name a solution, it only needs to name a problem.<br />
Thanks for the spot to share my views&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Mercer</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html/comment-page-1#comment-13909</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2007/11/michael-wesch-d.html#comment-13909</guid>
		<description>Jeremy&#039;s Elbonian education reforms post: a really nice piece of satire. Much more interesting than just writing a ten point rebuttal. More interesting for him to write, more interesting for me to read ;-).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy&#8217;s Elbonian education reforms post: a really nice piece of satire. Much more interesting than just writing a ten point rebuttal. More interesting for him to write, more interesting for me to read <img src='http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

