<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ROTW: Assessing students with disabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/07/rotw-assessing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/07/rotw-assessing.html</link>
	<description>Technology, leadership, and the future of schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Janowski</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/07/rotw-assessing.html/comment-page-1#comment-14283</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Janowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2007/07/rotw-assessing.html#comment-14283</guid>
		<description>Scott,
The paragraph you cited is so true.  Prior to NCLB, there wasn&#039;t any accountability for students identified with disabilities and this is an important point that speaks to one (the only?) benefit of NCLB.  Schools were FINALLY held accountable for their students with special needs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
The paragraph you cited is so true.  Prior to NCLB, there wasn&#8217;t any accountability for students identified with disabilities and this is an important point that speaks to one (the only?) benefit of NCLB.  Schools were FINALLY held accountable for their students with special needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

