<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be careful, be critical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/04/be_careful_be_c.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/04/be_careful_be_c.html</link>
	<description>Technology, leadership, and the future of schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Foote</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/04/be_careful_be_c.html/comment-page-1#comment-14755</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Foote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2007/04/be_careful_be_c.html#comment-14755</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I had posted about this as well, (http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/05/baby-with-the-bathwater/) and then some discussions on Ning by Sylvia Martinez had brought some of the faulty headlines to my attention.

I agree the editorial is well done.  It was astonishing to see the interpretations of the study as presented by the headlines. (not to mention frustrating!)


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I had posted about this as well, (<a href="http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/05/baby-with-the-bathwater/" rel="nofollow">http://futura.edublogs.org/2007/04/05/baby-with-the-bathwater/</a>) and then some discussions on Ning by Sylvia Martinez had brought some of the faulty headlines to my attention.</p>
<p>I agree the editorial is well done.  It was astonishing to see the interpretations of the study as presented by the headlines. (not to mention frustrating!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/2007/04/be_careful_be_c.html/comment-page-1#comment-14756</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annahein.com/2007/04/be_careful_be_c.html#comment-14756</guid>
		<description>Given that journalists recently have come under scrutiny for ethical issues and the fact that most news sources are financially motivated, is it unreasonable to think that individuals through web 2.0 tools are serving the traditional role of watchdog? What does this mean for our free press?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that journalists recently have come under scrutiny for ethical issues and the fact that most news sources are financially motivated, is it unreasonable to think that individuals through web 2.0 tools are serving the traditional role of watchdog? What does this mean for our free press?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

